live
weekly refresh
basedagi.org
benchmark evidence

BenchLM Math

BenchLM composite math score (0-100).

winner on BenchLM Math
direct benchmark result, not a broad vertical composite | source row dated 2026-05-28
scored on 2026-05-28
latest mapped results | top 20
#ModelScoreEvidenceTested
1OpenAI: GPT-5.5
Openai
97.4
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
2Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic
94.9
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
3OpenAI: GPT-5.4
Openai
94.4
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
4Z.ai: GLM 5
Z Ai
91.3
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
5Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
87.7
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
6Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
86.3
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
7OpenAI: GPT-5.2
Openai
81.0
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
8Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
75.7
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
9Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
73.4
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
10OpenAI: GPT-5.1
Openai
68.2
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
what this result means

BenchLM composite math score (0-100).

This benchmark contributes direct public evidence. Read its scope before generalizing the result.

A win here is a win on BenchLM Math. Broad task pages require independent corroboration before naming a general winner.

source record
category: math
metric: score
matched models: 10
latest source date: 2026-05-28
direction: higher is better
inspect upstream source ->