live
weekly refresh
basedagi.org
benchmark evidence

BenchLM Reasoning

BenchLM composite reasoning score (0-100).

winner on BenchLM Reasoning
direct benchmark result, not a broad vertical composite | source row dated 2026-05-28
scored on 2026-05-28
latest mapped results | top 20
#ModelScoreEvidenceTested
1OpenAI: GPT-5.5
Openai
96.8
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
2OpenAI: GPT-5.4
Openai
95.6
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
3Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
88.4
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
4OpenAI: GPT-5.2
Openai
83.8
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
5Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
83.2
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
6Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic
70.1
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
7OpenAI: GPT-5.1
Openai
67.3
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
8Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
62.4
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
9Z.ai: GLM 5
Z Ai
60.8
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
10Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
59.4
model-only
aggregator
2026-05-28
what this result means

BenchLM composite reasoning score (0-100).

This benchmark contributes direct public evidence. Read its scope before generalizing the result.

A win here is a win on BenchLM Reasoning. Broad task pages require independent corroboration before naming a general winner.

source record
category: reasoning
metric: score
matched models: 10
latest source date: 2026-05-28
direction: higher is better
inspect upstream source ->