▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
96.6
higher score
vs
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5
86.3
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.6 | 86.3 | +10.3 |
| Coding | 71.2 | 69.1 | +2.1 |
| Reasoning | — | 71.8 | — |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | 84.8 | — |
| JSON | — | 46.1 | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Context window | 1M | 200K |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $5.00/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00/M | $25.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 better than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher overall (96.6 vs 86.3) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5?
Both models are priced equally at $5/M input tokens.
Which model is better for coding?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads on coding with a score of 71.2 vs 69.1 for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.