▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
96.6
vs
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
95.4
These two models are effectively tied on overall score within the two-point margin. Choose based on pricing, context window, or task-specific performance below.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.6 | 95.4 | +1.2 |
| Coding | 71.2 | 73.2 | -2.0 |
| Reasoning | — | 68.3 | — |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $5.00/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00/M | $25.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 better than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 are closely matched in overall score. Choose based on pricing, context window, or the task-specific scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?
Both models are priced equally at $5/M input tokens.
Which model is better for coding?
Both models perform similarly on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, LiveCodeBench).