▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6
96.6
higher score
vs
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5
85.7
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 96.6 | 85.7 | +10.9 |
| Coding | 71.2 | 59.8 | +11.4 |
| Reasoning | — | 45.3 | — |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | 84.3 | — |
| JSON | — | 28.6 | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $3.00/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00/M | $15.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 better than Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher overall (96.6 vs 85.7) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 or Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper at $3/M input tokens vs $5/M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6.
Which model is better for coding?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads on coding with a score of 71.2 vs 59.8 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.5. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.