▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
95.4
higher score
vs
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
88.7
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.4 | 88.7 | +6.7 |
| Coding | 73.2 | 56.5 | +16.7 |
| Reasoning | 68.3 | 68.1 | +0.2 |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $3.00/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00/M | $15.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 better than Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher overall (95.4 vs 88.7) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 or Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper at $3/M input tokens vs $5/M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7.
Which model is better for coding?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding with a score of 73.2 vs 56.5 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.