▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
95.4
higher score
vs
OpenAI: GPT-5.4
90.2
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.4 | 90.2 | +5.2 |
| Coding | 73.2 | — | — |
| Reasoning | 68.3 | 74.4 | -6.1 |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | 88.9 | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Openai |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $2.50/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00/M | $15.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 better than OpenAI: GPT-5.4?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher overall (95.4 vs 90.2) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 or OpenAI: GPT-5.4?
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 is cheaper at $2.5/M input tokens vs $5/M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7.
Which model is better for coding?
Both models perform similarly on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, LiveCodeBench).