▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
95.4
higher score
vs
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini
84.9
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 95.4 | 84.9 | +10.5 |
| Coding | 73.2 | — | — |
| Reasoning | 68.3 | — | — |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Openai |
| Context window | 1M | 400K |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $0.75/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00/M | $4.50/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 better than OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher overall (95.4 vs 84.9) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 or OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini?
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Mini is cheaper at $0.75/M input tokens vs $5/M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7.
Which model is better for coding?
Both models perform similarly on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, LiveCodeBench).