▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
87.6
vs
Z.ai: GLM 5
86.0
These two models are effectively tied on overall score within the two-point margin. Choose based on pricing, context window, or task-specific performance below.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Z.ai: GLM 5 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 87.6 | 86.0 | +1.6 |
| Coding | 69.7 | 65.3 | +4.4 |
| Reasoning | 68.2 | — | — |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Z.ai: GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z Ai |
| Context window | 1M | 205K |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $0.60/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $25.00/M | $1.92/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 better than Z.ai: GLM 5?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 and Z.ai: GLM 5 are closely matched in overall score. Choose based on pricing, context window, or the task-specific scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 or Z.ai: GLM 5?
Z.ai: GLM 5 is cheaper at $0.6/M input tokens vs $5/M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7.
Which model is better for coding?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding with a score of 69.7 vs 65.3 for Z.ai: GLM 5. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.