▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
89.6
higher score
vs
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
87.5
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.6 | 87.5 | +2.1 |
| Coding | 56.1 | 69.9 | -13.8 |
| Reasoning | 66.7 | 68.2 | -1.5 |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $3.00/M | $5.00/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $15.00/M | $25.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher overall (89.6 vs 87.5) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper at $3/M input tokens vs $5/M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7.
Which model is better for coding?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding with a score of 69.9 vs 56.1 for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.