▸ compare
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6
88.7
higher score
vs
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro
81.2
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.7 | 81.2 | +7.5 |
| Coding | 56.5 | 50.7 | +5.8 |
| Reasoning | 68.1 | 49.1 | +19.0 |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | 72.6 | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $3.00/M | $1.25/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $15.00/M | $10.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher overall (88.7 vs 81.2) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro is cheaper at $1.25/M input tokens vs $3/M for Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6.
Which model is better for coding?
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads on coding with a score of 56.5 vs 50.7 for Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.