▸ compare
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.1
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
81.2
vs
OpenAI: GPT-5.1
81.1
These two models are effectively tied on overall score within the two-point margin. Choose based on pricing, context window, or task-specific performance below.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite | OpenAI: GPT-5.1 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 81.2 | 81.1 | +0.1 |
| Coding | 46.7 | 61.1 | -14.4 |
| Reasoning | 68.2 | 68.4 | -0.2 |
| Math | — | 84.0 | — |
| Writing | — | 80.0 | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite | OpenAI: GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Openai | |
| Context window | 1M | 400K |
| Input $/M tokens | $0.07/M | $1.25/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $0.30/M | $10.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite better than OpenAI: GPT-5.1?
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite and OpenAI: GPT-5.1 are closely matched in overall score. Choose based on pricing, context window, or the task-specific scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper: Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite or OpenAI: GPT-5.1?
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.075/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for OpenAI: GPT-5.1.
Which model is better for coding?
OpenAI: GPT-5.1 leads on coding with a score of 61.1 vs 46.7 for Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.