▸ compare
OpenAI: GPT-5.1 vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
OpenAI: GPT-5.1
81.4
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
81.2
These two models are effectively tied on overall score within the two-point margin. Choose based on pricing, context window, or task-specific performance below.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | OpenAI: GPT-5.1 | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 81.4 | 81.2 | +0.2 |
| Coding | 60.4 | 46.8 | +13.6 |
| Reasoning | 67.0 | 68.6 | -1.6 |
| Math | 82.1 | — | — |
| Writing | 80.2 | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | OpenAI: GPT-5.1 | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Openai | |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $1.25/M | $0.07/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $10.00/M | $0.30/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is OpenAI: GPT-5.1 better than Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
OpenAI: GPT-5.1 and Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite are closely matched in overall score. Choose based on pricing, context window, or the task-specific scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper: OpenAI: GPT-5.1 or Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.075/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for OpenAI: GPT-5.1.
Which model is better for coding?
OpenAI: GPT-5.1 leads on coding with a score of 60.4 vs 46.8 for Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.