▸ compare
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
OpenAI: GPT-5.2
81.3
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
81.2
These two models are effectively tied on overall score within the two-point margin. Choose based on pricing, context window, or task-specific performance below.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | OpenAI: GPT-5.2 | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 81.3 | 81.2 | +0.1 |
| Coding | 69.9 | 46.7 | +23.2 |
| Reasoning | 67.8 | 68.2 | -0.4 |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | 79.9 | — | — |
| JSON | 54.2 | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | OpenAI: GPT-5.2 | Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Openai | |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $1.75/M | $0.07/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $14.00/M | $0.30/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is OpenAI: GPT-5.2 better than Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 and Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite are closely matched in overall score. Choose based on pricing, context window, or the task-specific scores in the table above.
Which is cheaper: OpenAI: GPT-5.2 or Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite?
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.075/M input tokens vs $1.75/M for OpenAI: GPT-5.2.
Which model is better for coding?
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 leads on coding with a score of 69.9 vs 46.7 for Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.