live
weekly refresh
basedagi.org
▸ compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7

Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.

▸ verdict
OpenAI: GPT-5.4
89.0
vs
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
87.5
These two models are effectively tied on overall score within the two-point margin. Choose based on pricing, context window, or task-specific performance below.
▸ score breakdown
TaskOpenAI: GPT-5.4Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7Δ
Overall89.087.5+1.5
Coding—69.9—
Reasoning71.068.2+2.8
Math———
Writing88.0——
JSON———
▸ specs & pricing
AttributeOpenAI: GPT-5.4Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
ProviderOpenaiAnthropic
Context window1M1M
Input $/M tokens$2.50/M$5.00/M
Output $/M tokens$15.00/M$25.00/M
Weightsproprietaryproprietary
▸ frequently asked

Is OpenAI: GPT-5.4 better than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 and Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 are closely matched in overall score. Choose based on pricing, context window, or the task-specific scores in the table above.

Which is cheaper: OpenAI: GPT-5.4 or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?

OpenAI: GPT-5.4 is cheaper at $2.5/M input tokens vs $5/M for Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7.

Which model is better for coding?

Both models perform similarly on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, LiveCodeBench).