▸ compare
OpenAI: GPT-5.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
OpenAI: GPT-5.5
91.4
higher score
vs
Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7
87.5
OpenAI: GPT-5.5 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | OpenAI: GPT-5.5 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.4 | 87.5 | +3.9 |
| Coding | — | 69.9 | — |
| Reasoning | 73.8 | 68.2 | +5.6 |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | 90.0 | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | OpenAI: GPT-5.5 | Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Openai | Anthropic |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $5.00/M | $5.00/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $30.00/M | $25.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is OpenAI: GPT-5.5 better than Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?
OpenAI: GPT-5.5 scores higher overall (91.4 vs 87.5) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: OpenAI: GPT-5.5 or Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7?
Both models are priced equally at $5/M input tokens.
Which model is better for coding?
Both models perform similarly on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, LiveCodeBench).