▸ compare
Z.ai: GLM 5 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5
86.2
higher score
vs
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash
80.5
Z.ai: GLM 5 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Z.ai: GLM 5 | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 86.2 | 80.5 | +5.7 |
| Coding | 64.9 | — | — |
| Reasoning | — | — | — |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | — | — |
| JSON | — | — | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Z.ai: GLM 5 | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z Ai | Deepseek |
| Context window | 203K | 1M |
| Input $/M tokens | $0.60/M | $0.09/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $1.92/M | $0.18/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Z.ai: GLM 5 better than DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash?
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher overall (86.2 vs 80.5) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Z.ai: GLM 5 or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.09/M input tokens vs $0.6/M for Z.ai: GLM 5.
Which model is better for coding?
Both models perform similarly on coding benchmarks (SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, LiveCodeBench).