▸ compare
Z.ai: GLM 5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2
Side-by-side benchmark comparison based on independent public data. Scores, pricing, context, and task breakdown.
▸ verdict
Z.ai: GLM 5
86.2
higher score
vs
OpenAI: GPT-5.2
81.3
Z.ai: GLM 5 leads with a higher composite benchmark score. It's the stronger choice for general-purpose tasks based on public benchmark data.
▸ score breakdown
| Task | Z.ai: GLM 5 | OpenAI: GPT-5.2 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 86.2 | 81.3 | +4.9 |
| Coding | 64.7 | 69.9 | -5.2 |
| Reasoning | — | 67.8 | — |
| Math | — | — | — |
| Writing | — | 79.9 | — |
| JSON | — | 54.2 | — |
▸ specs & pricing
| Attribute | Z.ai: GLM 5 | OpenAI: GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z Ai | Openai |
| Context window | 203K | 400K |
| Input $/M tokens | $0.60/M | $1.75/M |
| Output $/M tokens | $1.92/M | $14.00/M |
| Weights | proprietary | proprietary |
▸ frequently asked
Is Z.ai: GLM 5 better than OpenAI: GPT-5.2?
Z.ai: GLM 5 scores higher overall (86.2 vs 81.3) in the benchmark composite. The best choice depends on the specific use case and budget.
Which is cheaper: Z.ai: GLM 5 or OpenAI: GPT-5.2?
Z.ai: GLM 5 is cheaper at $0.6/M input tokens vs $1.75/M for OpenAI: GPT-5.2.
Which model is better for coding?
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 leads on coding with a score of 69.9 vs 64.7 for Z.ai: GLM 5. This is based on SWE-Bench, Aider Polyglot, and LiveCodeBench data.