Model Profile
google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite
Use this page to decide where this model is a strong fit. Rankings below are benchmark-backed by use case, with explicit confidence and contributor metrics.
Identity
ID: external/google/gemini-2-5-flash-lite
Author: google
Origin: external_benchmark_shadow
Arch: unknown
Benchmark Coverage
Scored use cases: 12
Avg confidence: 40.4%
Evidence points: 120
Raw rows: 187
Weighted rows: 29
Catalog Metadata
Parameters: unknown
Context window: 4096
Downloads: 0
Price / 1M tokens: $0.17 (blended 3:1)
Intelligence Profile
Dimension Breakdown
No creativity benchmarks found
No based benchmarks found
* Low confidence — limited benchmark evidence for this dimension
3/5 dimensions scored · Last updated Apr 14, 2026
Benchmark Signals
Click through to the benchmark source behind this model profile.
BFCL Relevance Detection Official
Relevance Detection
Normalized value 50.0% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Casual chat companion
bfcl_relevance_detection_official.relevance_detection · Apr 1, 2026
BFCL Relevance Detection Official
Irrelevance Detection
Normalized value 92.9% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Casual chat companion
bfcl_relevance_detection_official.irrelevance_detection · Apr 1, 2026
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2
Insurance AC
Normalized value 63.6% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Claims summary
galileo_agent_v2.insurance_ac · Apr 1, 2026
BFCL Memory Official
Memory Acc
Normalized value 22.7% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Adult ERP roleplay (explicit)
bfcl_memory_official.memory_acc · Apr 1, 2026
Vectara HHEM Leaderboard
overall_hallucination_error_pct
Normalized value 93.1% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Thesis red teaming
vectara_hhem_leaderboard.overall_hallucination_error_pct · Apr 1, 2026
Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2
Insurance TSQ
Normalized value 60.0% · confidence 100.0%
Strongest impact in Claims summary
galileo_agent_v2.insurance_tsq · Apr 1, 2026
Some fit rows have limited benchmark evidence.
2 of 12 scored use cases have low confidence or thin contributor coverage.
Coverage Diagnostics
actively scoredUse-Case Scores
116
Total Measurements
187
Weighted Measurements
29
Weighted Sources
8
Raw Source Coverage
Weighted Source Coverage
Best Use Cases for This Model
| Use Case | Score |
|---|---|
| Tarot-style reading use_case.spiritual.tarot_reading | 17.8% |
| Life coaching and goal planning use_case.companion.life_coaching | 17.8% |
| Casual chat companion use_case.companion.casual_chat | 17.8% |
| Empathetic support chat use_case.companion.empathy_support_chat | 17.3% |
| Mindfulness and meditation scripts use_case.wellness.mindfulness_scripts | 17.2% |
| Adult ERP roleplay (explicit) use_case.adult.erp_roleplay | 15.3% |
| SFW roleplay and simulation use_case.creative.sfw_roleplay_simulation | 14.9% |
| Interactive fiction / DM use_case.creative.interactive_fiction_dm | 14.4% |
| NPC dialogue use_case.gaming.npc_dialogue | 14.4% |
| Adult erotica (long-form, explicit) use_case.adult.erotica_longform | 13.1% |
| Claims summary use_case.ins.claims_summary | 13.1% |
| Thesis red teaming use_case.fin.thesis_red_team | 13.1% |