BasedAGIBasedAGI
Menu
Rankings live

marketing_sales

Product positioning and messaging

Develop positioning, value props, and message pillars with tradeoffs.

#1 Recommendation

Grok-4-0709

Strong on Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 Avg TSQ (85%) and UGI Leaderboard Writing ✍️ (99%)

external/xai/grok-4-0709

26.2%

Score

35.5%

Confidence

Limited benchmark evidence for this use case.

61 ranked models with average evidence of 11.6 points. Rankings may shift as more benchmark data is ingested.

Ranked Models

30

Evidence Quality

82%

Scoring

Benchmark-backed

Top Signal

Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2: Avg TSQ

All Ranked Models

Max params:
Min confidence:
30 of 30
RankModelScore
#1Grok-4-0709

Strong on Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 Avg TSQ (85%) and UGI Leaderboard Writing ✍️ (99%)

26.2%
#2gemini-2.5-pro

Strong on Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 Avg TSQ (79%) and UGI Leaderboard Writing ✍️ (96%)

25.9%
#3gpt-4.1-20250414

Strong on Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 Avg TSQ (64%) and Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2 Avg AC (100%)

25.9%
#4claude-sonnet-4-20250514
22.5%
#5gpt-4o
21.2%
#6gemini-3-pro-preview
20.3%
#7qwen-2.5-72b-instruct
19.1%
#8gemini-2.5-flash
18.8%
#9google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
18.4%
#10gpt-5-2025-08-07
16.9%
#11openai/gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
16.6%
#12gpt-5.1-2025-11-13
16.2%
#13anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6
16.0%
#14claude-opus-4-5-20251101
15.9%
#15xai-org/grok-4-fast-reasoning
15.9%
#16gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
15.6%
#17gpt-4.1-mini-20250414
15.4%
#18anthropic/claude-opus-4-6-thinking
15.2%
#19gemini-3-flash-preview
15.2%
#20xai-org/grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
15.1%
#21gpt-5.2-2025-12-11
15.0%
#22anthropic/claude-opus-4-5-20251101-thinking
14.7%
#25kimi/kimi-k2.5-thinking
13.7%
#27anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-thinking
13.4%
#29Kimi-K2-Instruct
12.7%
#30o3-20250416
12.7%
#31google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview
12.6%
#32x-ai/grok-3
12.3%
#33GLM-4.5-Air
12.0%
#35gemma-7b-it
11.7%

Compare Models

Model A leads by +0.3%

Shareable Link →

Model A

Grok-4-0709

external/xai/grok-4-0709

26.2%

Rank #1

Confidence 35.5%19 evidence pts

Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2: Avg TSQ

Value 84.6% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 4.1%

galileo_agent_v2.avg_tsq (Mar 12, 2026)

UGI Leaderboard: Writing ✍️

Value 99.2% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 2.2%

ugi_main.writing (Mar 12, 2026)

Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2: Avg AC

Value 56.5% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 1.6%

galileo_agent_v2.avg_ac (Mar 12, 2026)

Vals CorpFin v2: overall_accuracy_pct

Value 93.6% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 0.8%

vals_corp_fin_v2.overall_accuracy_pct (Mar 12, 2026)

Model B

gemini-2.5-pro

external/google/gemini-2-5-pro

25.9%

Rank #2

Confidence 36.8%22 evidence pts

Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2: Avg TSQ

Value 79.5% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 3.8%

galileo_agent_v2.avg_tsq (Mar 12, 2026)

UGI Leaderboard: Writing ✍️

Value 96.3% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 2.2%

ugi_main.writing (Mar 12, 2026)

Galileo Agent Leaderboard v2: Avg AC

Value 58.7% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 1.7%

galileo_agent_v2.avg_ac (Mar 12, 2026)

Vectara HHEM Leaderboard: overall_hallucination_error_pct

Value 76.0% · Conf 100.0% · Weight 0.9%

vectara_hhem_leaderboard.overall_hallucination_error_pct (Mar 12, 2026)

Ranking Diagnostics & Missing Models

Source Lift

Ranked

61

Sources

8

Quality

Insufficient

Vals Legal Bench

vals_legal_bench

42 rows

0.7% avg lift

Vals CorpFin v2

vals_corp_fin_v2

42 rows

0.6% avg lift

Vals LiveCodeBench

vals_lcb

41 rows

0.6% avg lift

Vals GPQA

vals_gpqa

41 rows

0.6% avg lift

Missing Strong Models

No obvious gaps right now.

Taxonomy Details

Core Tasks

task.brainstorm_ideastask.tradeoff_analysis

Required Modes

none

Domains

domain.marketing_sales

Related Use Cases